skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Karwowski, Maciej"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Free, publicly-accessible full text available March 13, 2026
  2. Scoring divergent thinking tasks opens multiple avenues and possibilities – decisions researchers have to make. While some scholars postulate that scoring should focus on the best ideas provided, the measurement of the best responses (e.g., “top scoring”) comes along with challenges. More specifically, compared to the average quality across all responses, top scoring uses less information—the “bad” ideas are thrown away—which decreases reliability. To resolve this issue, this article introduces a multidimensional top-scoring approach analogous to linear growth modeling which retains information provided by all responses (best ideas and “bad” ideas). Across two studies, using both subjective human ratings and semantic distance originality scoring of responses to over a dozen divergent thinking tasks, we demonstrated that Maximum (the best idea) and Top2 Scoring (two best ideas) could surpass typically applied average scoring in measurement precision when the “bad” ideas’ originality is used as auxiliary information (i.e., additional information in the analysis). We thus recommend retaining all ideas when scoring divergent thinking tasks, and we discuss the potential this new approach holds for creativity research and practice. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Malaria-causing protozoa of the genusPlasmodiumhave exerted one of the strongest selective pressures on the human genome, and resistance alleles provide biomolecular footprints that outline the historical reach of these species1. Nevertheless, debate persists over when and how malaria parasites emerged as human pathogens and spread around the globe1,2. To address these questions, we generated high-coverage ancient mitochondrial and nuclear genome-wide data fromP. falciparum,P. vivaxandP. malariaefrom 16 countries spanning around 5,500 years of human history. We identifiedP. vivaxandP. falciparumacross geographically disparate regions of Eurasia from as early as the fourth and first millenniabce, respectively; forP. vivax, this evidence pre-dates textual references by several millennia3. Genomic analysis supports distinct disease histories forP. falciparumandP. vivaxin the Americas: similarities between now-eliminated European and peri-contact South American strains indicate that European colonizers were the source of AmericanP. vivax, whereas the trans-Atlantic slave trade probably introducedP. falciparuminto the Americas. Our data underscore the role of cross-cultural contacts in the dissemination of malaria, laying the biomolecular foundation for future palaeo-epidemiological research into the impact ofPlasmodiumparasites on human history. Finally, our unexpected discovery ofP. falciparumin the high-altitude Himalayas provides a rare case study in which individual mobility can be inferred from infection status, adding to our knowledge of cross-cultural connectivity in the region nearly three millennia ago. 
    more » « less